Table of Contents
When it comes to the world of chainsaws, there are few brands that stand out as prominently as Stihl and Husqvarna. These two powerhouses have been battling it out for years, each trying to outdo the other with their latest models.
In this article, we will examine two of their most popular mid-range chainsaws, the Stihl MS 251 and the Husqvarna 445, to determine which one comes out on top in this chainsaw showdown.
Like two heavyweight boxers in the ring, the Stihl MS 251 vs Husqvarna 445 are both powerful contenders, each with their own strengths and weaknesses.
- Stihl MS 251 has a more powerful engine and chain compared to Husqvarna 445.
- Husqvarna 445 emits less pollution and is $50 cheaper than Stihl MS 251.
- Husqvarna 445 has a larger fuel capacity of 15.2 oz, while Stihl MS 251 has 13.2 oz.
- The choice between the two chainsaws ultimately depends on personal preference and budget, but Husqvarna 445 is recommended due to its better fuel capacity and emission levels.
Power and Chain Comparison
The comparative analysis reveals that Stihl MS 251 has a more potent engine than Husqvarna 445. The former’s engine has a power output of 3 bhp, while the latter’s engine produces 2.8 hp.
This difference in engine performance can have a significant impact on the chainsaw’s cutting ability, especially when dealing with harder or thicker materials.
Additionally, Stihl uses the Rapid Micro 3 chain, which is known for its cutting efficiency and durability, while Husqvarna employs the H30 Micro chisel PIXEL chain.
However, it is important to consider that the differences in engine performance and chain types between Stihl MS 251 and Husqvarna 445 can also affect their prices. Stihl MS 251 is generally more expensive than Husqvarna 445, due to its higher horsepower and more efficient chain.
Therefore, buyers should weigh the importance of engine power and chain quality against their budget when making a purchasing decision.
Emission and Fuel Efficiency
Regarding emission and fuel efficiency, a comparison between the two mid-range chainsaws reveals notable differences in their respective capabilities.
The Stihl MS 251 reduces emissions by 50% and fuel consumption by 20%, while the Husqvarna 445 reduces emissions by 60%. The Husqvarna also has a larger fuel capacity of 15.2 oz, compared to the Stihl’s 13.2 oz.
Environmental impact is an important consideration when choosing a chainsaw, as emissions contribute to air pollution and can harm the environment. While both chainsaws have made efforts to reduce their emissions, the Husqvarna 445 comes out on top in this category.
The larger fuel capacity of the Husqvarna also adds to its cost effectiveness, as it allows for longer periods of use without needing to refuel.
Overall, the Husqvarna 445 is the better choice for those looking for a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective option.
Factors to Consider When Choosing
When considering which mid-range chainsaw to purchase, there are several important factors to take into account. One of the first things to consider is the starting mechanism of the chainsaw.
Both the Stihl MS 251 and Husqvarna 445 have reliable starting mechanisms, but it is important to check the mechanism before making a purchase to ensure that it is easy to use and does not require excessive effort.
Another important factor to consider is budget constraints. While the Husqvarna 445 is $50 cheaper than the Stihl MS 251, it is important to consider whether the lower price is worth sacrificing the benefits of a more powerful engine and chain.
Another factor to consider when choosing a mid-range chainsaw is fuel capacity. The Husqvarna 445 has a larger fuel capacity of 15.2 oz, which may be more suitable for those who will be using the chainsaw for extended periods without easy access to a fuel source.
Additionally, the efficiency of the engine is an important factor to consider to ensure that the chainsaw will be able to handle the tasks it is intended for.